This template is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
I wonder if using a {{succession box}} would be preferable to this template? It's very large, and will get larger annually. It seems to me that categories and/or succession boxes are better suited for really long lists like this. --Muchness 18:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I guess a solution to this would be a template for each decade perhaps?--SkullyCollinsEdits 13:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We either need the template or the succession box, but not both. mattbr30 13:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. A succession box would be more appropriate.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
